<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Enter the HEEBrew &#187; SEO Rants</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.heebrew.com/category/seo-rants/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.heebrew.com</link>
	<description>Marketing. Jew. Food. Life.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 14:19:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>#1 Ranking? Who Cares.</title>
		<link>http://www.heebrew.com/2010/04/13/1-ranking-who-cares/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heebrew.com/2010/04/13/1-ranking-who-cares/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Apr 2010 15:15:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Feiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Frank T. Dawg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pool cues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heebrew.com/?p=252</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, I checked the SERPs this morning and once again PoolDawg is once again ranked #1 for some key terms that I frequently obsess over.  I turned off the personalized search option, checked the datacenters, and sure enough, we were still at the top of the list for &#8220;pool cues&#8221; as well as some other [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I checked the SERPs this morning and once again PoolDawg is once again ranked #1 for some key terms that I frequently obsess over.  I turned off the personalized search option, checked the datacenters, and sure enough, we were still at the top of the list for &#8220;pool cues&#8221; as well as some other search terms that seem to be decent traffic and conversion drivers.  The question of course is whether or not this even matters anymore.</p>
<p>A few months ago, the almighty G changed the way they serve results, basing them on personalized search history rather than solely on the famous algorithm.  If you do a search and click on the link in the upper right hand corner that says &#8220;web history&#8221;, you&#8217;ll be taken to a page that looks like the screenshot below:</p>
<p style="text-align: center;"><img class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-253" title="goog" src="http://www.heebrew.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/goog.png" alt="goog" width="480" height="300" /></p>
<p>When you get there, you&#8217;ll notice that your search activity customization is defaulted to the &#8220;enabled&#8221; position.  What this means is that the search results you&#8217;re seeing have been rearranged to better mesh with your search patterns and history.  In other words, what I see may be very different than what you see when you search.</p>
<p>From an SEO standpoint, what this really means is that there is no true #1 anymore.  If you turn off the customization, you can see the unaffected results, but the average searcher wouldn&#8217;t ever do this.  The base algorithm results clearly still have a huge impact on what you see, but the days of truly being #1 seem to be over.</p>
<p>As an online marketing professional, I have very mixed feelings about this.  The SERPs have been an easy measuring stick for years.  On the other hand though, it frees me up to obsess over other things like how to implement guerrilla marketing tactics to get more exposure for a ceramic bulldog named <a href="http://www.franksdawghouse.com">Frank T. Dawg</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heebrew.com/2010/04/13/1-ranking-who-cares/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Five Stages of SEO Redux</title>
		<link>http://www.heebrew.com/2010/03/14/the-five-stages-of-seo-redux/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heebrew.com/2010/03/14/the-five-stages-of-seo-redux/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Mar 2010 22:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Feiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SERPs]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heebrew.com/?p=114</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A couple of years ago I posted my own riff on the stages of grief with The Five Stages of SEO.  Since I&#8217;m still trying to find my voice a bit with this blog (and I&#8217;m feeling both nostalgic and lazy today), I decided to repurpose this concept under the guise of &#8220;reflection&#8221;.
First, let&#8217;s take [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A couple of years ago I posted my own riff on the stages of grief with The Five Stages of SEO.  Since I&#8217;m still trying to find my voice a bit with this blog (and I&#8217;m feeling both nostalgic and lazy today), I decided to repurpose this concept under the guise of &#8220;reflection&#8221;.</p>
<p>First, let&#8217;s take another look at the Five Stages:</p>
<p><span style="text-decoration: underline;"><strong>The Five Stages of SEO</strong></span></p>
<p><strong>Denial</strong> &#8211; &#8220;No, my SERPs couldn&#8217;t be that bad! There&#8217;s got to be a quick fix to get us to #1&#8243;. We&#8217;ve all been there. It&#8217;s the most important term (in the eyes of you and/or your boss) and your site isn&#8217;t anywhere to be found. You&#8217;ve heard about some &#8220;quick fix&#8221; solutions and you put them into action, only to find that your quick fixes didn&#8217;t really help at all. This leads to&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Anger</strong> &#8211; &#8220;I changed my title tags and doused pages with keywords and we&#8217;re still not ranking on Google! What gives??&#8221; Anger is bound to happen. After all, you just read an article about SEO and applied their strategies so why shouldn&#8217;t you expect to be #1? After the steam has stopped coming out of your ears and nostrils, you then start&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Bargaining</strong> &#8211; &#8220;Who do you know at Google? Is there any way we can buy a top ranking? There&#8217;s got to be some way to work with them&#8230; maybe if we spend more money advertising?&#8221; Don&#8217;t worry, this is a natural part of the process. Of course, as we all know, there is no bargaining with Google. Google is the mighty White Whale and we are all little Ahab&#8217;s fighting against something that simply does not care.  Either they like your site or they don&#8217;t, which leads to&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Depression</strong> &#8211; &#8220;This is hopeless. I tried all the tricks from that article and nothing is working. Woe is me and my poor, unloved site.&#8221; Again, this is a natural feeling. You tried a few things, you even asked Google to take your money in exchange for a good ranking and you&#8217;ve found nothing but dead ends. Your site still isn&#8217;t on page 1, but fear not for there is a light at the end of the tunnel and it isn&#8217;t the proverbial train coming to squish you. Once you realize this, it leads to&#8230;</p>
<p><strong>Acceptance</strong>- &#8220;Well, all the shortcuts didn&#8217;t work and we couldn&#8217;t buy a #1 ranking, so I guess we&#8217;ll have to do it the old fashioned way.&#8221; This is when you roll up your sleeves, start producing lots of good content and work on building links.</p>
<p>Once you accept the fact that there are no shortcuts to SEO, that is when you&#8217;ll start to see your site gain some traction. Search engines love good content and your visitors might dig it too. Build the good content and people will find it. If it&#8217;s really good, people will link to it. The more you become an authority, the more love Google and the other search engines will show.</p>
<p>Since the original writing of this concept, our natural traffic that we get from Google on a monthly basis has more than doubled.  I don&#8217;t state this to brag, but rather to make a point about not letting the tail wag the dog.  There are always going to be shortcuts when it comes to SEO.  Sometimes, for a short while anyway, those shortcuts will work.  What I&#8217;m saying is that it isn&#8217;t necessary to take shortcuts in order to improve your SERPs and grow your overall traffic.</p>
<p>I take a very holistic approach to SEO &#8211; only write content that reads well for your end users.  Does that mean I don&#8217;t focus on keywords?  I absolutely focus on keywords.  We are extremely strategic with our copywriting.  In the end though, I try to make sure that what we&#8217;re offering to the end user is informative and entertaining first.  After all, if your writing sucks it doesn&#8217;t matter how much extra traffic you get.  In the end, customers will leave because your copy isn&#8217;t engaging them.</p>
<p>Of course I&#8217;ll still obsess over certain keywords.  I can&#8217;t help it.  I still check more often than I should to see if we&#8217;re #1 for <a href="http://www.pooldawg.com">pool cues</a> (we keep flipping between #1 and 2 with our very respected and worthy adversary Ozone) and when we&#8217;ve fallen out of the top spot, I still get upset, but in the end I remind myself that 95% of our Google search traffic comes from searches other than pool cues and that over focusing on one phrase can have some seriously bad long term effects.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heebrew.com/2010/03/14/the-five-stages-of-seo-redux/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Not Pumped About Caffeine</title>
		<link>http://www.heebrew.com/2009/11/25/not-pumped-about-caffeine/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heebrew.com/2009/11/25/not-pumped-about-caffeine/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 23:25:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Feiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Caffeine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heebrew.com/?p=128</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It seems that Google is getting ready to roll the new Google Caffeine update live.  Based on everything I&#8217;ve heard and read, this shouldn&#8217;t have a drastic impact on the SERPs, but whenever Google makes what it calls a significant update, I get nervous.
On the positive side, Matt Cutts has stated that the update probably [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It seems that Google is getting ready to roll the new Google Caffeine update live.  Based on everything I&#8217;ve heard and read, this shouldn&#8217;t have a drastic impact on the SERPs, but whenever Google makes what it calls a significant update, I get nervous.</p>
<p>On the positive side, Matt Cutts has stated that the update probably won&#8217;t happen until after the holidays, which I&#8217;m sure has something to do with the nightmare that was the Florida update back in 2003.  During the holiday selling season, the last thing anyone wants to worry about is losing their precious #1 and above the fold rankings.</p>
<p>The bossman was nice enough to talk me off the ledge on this one, reminding me that based on Google&#8217;s &#8220;content is king&#8221; mantra and the fact that we play by the rules from an SEO perspective, any major updates should only have a positive impact on our sites.  I hope he&#8217;s right, but I guess we&#8217;ll find out in January (or when I can get my hands on the Caffeine Datacenter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heebrew.com/2009/11/25/not-pumped-about-caffeine/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Damn Google Shuffle</title>
		<link>http://www.heebrew.com/2009/02/06/damn-google-shuffle/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heebrew.com/2009/02/06/damn-google-shuffle/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Feb 2009 15:15:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Feiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Shuffle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heebrew.com/?p=87</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daily Obsessive Google Rank Check:
Pool Cues: #2
Pool Cue: #2
Well, those wacky kids over at Google have managed to shuffle me out of my beloved #1 ranking for both pool cue and pool cues.  Drag.  I get why PoolDawg and Ozone keep flip flopping between #1 and #2, but for Google to put a cue manufacturer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daily Obsessive Google Rank Check:<br />
Pool Cues: #2<br />
Pool Cue: #2</p>
<p>Well, those wacky kids over at Google have managed to shuffle me out of my beloved #1 ranking for both pool cue and pool cues.  Drag.  I get why PoolDawg and Ozone keep flip flopping between #1 and #2, but for Google to put a cue manufacturer site up at #1 for pool cues just doesn&#8217;t make much sense at all.  Especially for a site that is competely unusable with Firefox and Chrome.  Kudos to McDermott though for nabbing the top spot.</p>
<p>Yiddish Word of the Moment:</p>
<p>Schlameal and Schlamozel (they always go together)<br />
Definition:  Simply put, the schalmeal is the guy who spills the soup on someone and the schlamozel is the guy who gets the soup spilled on him</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heebrew.com/2009/02/06/damn-google-shuffle/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Glutton for Punishment</title>
		<link>http://www.heebrew.com/2008/12/27/glutton-for-punishment/</link>
		<comments>http://www.heebrew.com/2008/12/27/glutton-for-punishment/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:13:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Mike Feiman</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[SEO Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sports Rants]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bowl Picks]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[College Football]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NCAA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine optimization]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[SEO]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.heebrew.com/?p=46</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Daily Obsessive Google Rank Check:
Pool Cues: #1
Pool Cue: #2
Its funny.  The term billiards is probably the most competitive SEO term in our industry, it doesn&#8217;t convert well, but it continues to be a thorn in my side purely from a pride perspective.  The reality is that the term is pretty much a complete waste of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Daily Obsessive Google Rank Check:<br />
Pool Cues: #1<br />
Pool Cue: #2</p>
<p>Its funny.  The term billiards is probably the most competitive SEO term in our industry, it doesn&#8217;t convert well, but it continues to be a thorn in my side purely from a pride perspective.  The reality is that the term is pretty much a complete waste of time as all it does is bring a bunch of tire kickers to the site, but even so, I still feel like we should be on Page 1 (since that is what we do).  The last couple of weeks, I&#8217;ve been starting to focus on that term again (as well as working on getting pool cue back to #1).  I&#8217;ve got us up to #21 so far, but we&#8217;ll see how far I can take it.</p>
<p>In other news, Central Michigan choked last night, bringing my bowl record to 3-5.  Today I&#8217;m taking UNC +1.5 over West Virginia, Wisconsin +6 over Florida State and Miami +10 over Cal.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.heebrew.com/2008/12/27/glutton-for-punishment/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
